What is suggested by existing studies about sports favored by wealthy nations?

Existing studies indicate that sports favored by wealthy nations are often a reflection of broader social, economic, and cultural factors rather than being universally imposed on all regions. This means that while wealthier nations may have the resources to promote and elevate certain sports, these sports gain popularity in various parts of the world through organic interest and adaptation, rather than through top-down enforcement or imposition from wealthier nations.

Wealthy countries often have the infrastructure, funding, and media presence to support specific sports, leading to their prominence on a global scale. However, this prominence does not necessarily imply that these sports are forced upon other nations. Many countries adapt and embrace these sports based on their own cultural and social contexts. This complementary relationship allows for a diverse global sports culture where different regions may adopt and modify these sports to fit their unique identities.

In contrast, the other options either imply a simplification of the dynamics of global sports or present a misleading notion about the relationship between wealth and sports popularity. The concept of local sports, domination in all global events, and unequal competition speaks to broader nuances in international sports that are not necessarily derived from the fundamental relationship between wealth and sport preferences.