What do critics of interscholastic sport programs claim they interfere with?

Critics of interscholastic sport programs primarily contend that these programs interfere with the educational mission of schools. They argue that the focus on athletics can overshadow the fundamental purpose of education, which is to foster learning, cognitive development, and academic achievement. When schools allocate significant resources, time, and attention to sports programs, it can detract from academics and lead to an environment where winning in sports is prioritized over educational success.

Additionally, critics point out that the intensity and commitment required from student-athletes can further limit their time and energy for academic pursuits. This can create an imbalance in school priorities, potentially undermining the overall quality of education the institution provides. Thus, the argument emphasizes that while sports can have benefits, they should not come at the cost of the core educational values and purposes that schools are designed to uphold.